The illusion of cost savings
Many companies opt for a monolithic CMS such as WordPress or TYPO3 because the initial costs seem low. However, what may initially appear to be a wise, budget-friendly decision, turns out to be an expensive time and cost trap over time.
We are not talking about the obvious hosting costs, but about the Hidden Costs, which slowly eat away at your profit.
1. The plugin hell and the exploding maintenance costs
The The biggest cost factor in traditional systems is the complexity that arises from extensions. WordPress thrives on thousands of plugins.
The security risk: Every plugin is a potential security vulnerability. If it is not updated immediately, it opens the door to hackers. Emergency patches and removing hacks are extremely expensive.
The compatibility crisis: Updates of the CMS core often lead to incompatibilities with old plugins. Repairing faulty functions costs your team or agency hundreds of hours every year and increases the Website maintenance costs into the infinite.
The dependency: You are dependent on third parties. If a developer discontinues maintenance of a critical plugin, you will have to switch to a new one at a high cost.
2. Performance fixes and the WordPress limitation
You have one Slow website and try to fix the issue with caching plugins.
Overloaded databases: Monolithic systems store everything in one database. The more content, images, and plugins are added, the slower the queries become. The database becomes a burden that the WordPress Limitation demonstrated.
Costly optimizations: The attempt to optimize performance often leads to expensive, short-term solutions that do not address the root of the problem.
Long development cycles: New features or design adjustments often require interventions in the entire system, which can affect the. Time-to-Market extended significantly for important campaigns.
3. The lack of scalability and the costs of starting over (TYPO3 disadvantages)
When your company grows, you need flexibility for new channels (app, kiosk systems).Here, monolithic systems fail the hardest.
Starrer Code: Your content is tightly linked to the presentation. If you want to display content on an app, you either have to duplicate the entire system or have an extremely expensive custom API interface programmed.
Forced migration: The TYPO3 disadvantages or the WordPress Limitation This eventually leads to the costs of maintenance and the lack of innovation capability forcing a complete, expensive relaunch. So you end up paying twice: once for the original system and once for the emergency migration.
Headless vs Monolith: Choose the investment, not the cost trap
At Nexene, we offer you a Headless vs Monolith-Solution that eliminates these hidden costs. Your code is clean, maintenance is minimal, and security is maximized through decoupling. You are investing in a system that grows with your business instead of holding it back.
